Consumer Affairs
Sunday, January 4th, 2004 05:36 pmCan anyone advise?
A friend sent me some wonderful Christmas fishes from the Isle of Man. (No, no prizes for guessing who). However, they have only just arrived -- in two separate packages -- and are past best-by date. Paperwork in one package suggests that they weren't sent until the best-by date: postmark on one package is 2/1/04.
Is friend entitled to ring 'em up and get more fisssssssh* sent to me?
*raw and wrrrrriggling
A friend sent me some wonderful Christmas fishes from the Isle of Man. (No, no prizes for guessing who). However, they have only just arrived -- in two separate packages -- and are past best-by date. Paperwork in one package suggests that they weren't sent until the best-by date: postmark on one package is 2/1/04.
Is friend entitled to ring 'em up and get more fisssssssh* sent to me?
*raw and wrrrrriggling
no subject
Date: Sunday, January 4th, 2004 09:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 4th, 2004 10:19 am (UTC)I can't help thinking that's just fundamentally WRONG!
no subject
Date: Sunday, January 4th, 2004 10:48 am (UTC)[Actually, am only up to leaving the Shire in reread. Or rererererereread. Went to ROTK last night. Dead good if a bit needlessly messianic in places, mainly early on. After 2½h got me so spellbound I forgot to worry about safety of unlocked motorbike outside.]
no subject
Date: Sunday, January 4th, 2004 11:58 am (UTC)No harm in trying anyway. Are they nice fish? Will you need help devouring the replacements????
no subject
Date: Sunday, January 4th, 2004 02:49 pm (UTC)Actually no, don't. They're a bit too bony for my taste :)
no subject
Date: Monday, January 5th, 2004 06:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, January 4th, 2004 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, January 5th, 2004 01:40 am (UTC)and while I have your attention, you owe me email (or, quite possibly, avnet lost your reply to my email to you about 2nd draft of Thing)
no subject
Date: Tuesday, January 6th, 2004 04:01 pm (UTC)Noel