Proof of Astrology?
Thursday, April 1st, 2004 04:23 pmFind me a horoscope for Libra that says today is a bad day for communication, and I'll .. well, there wouldn't be a lot of point me spreading the word, would there? Not today.
1. Plymouth Social Services (on whom I finally gave up in disgust after 30 minutes on hold) fail to recognise a problem with their crossing out my figures and putting in their own.
"Well, we corrected them."
"If you know the correct values, and I don't, why are you asking me? Can't you just fill in the form on my father's behalf?"
"It's up to you to provide the figures."
"I did. You changed them."
"They were wrong."
2. Text messages sent to four people today. One has left her phone at home: one has forgotten to charge his phone: one has sent a reply that has nothing whatsoever to do with the question: one is AWOL. (For bonus points: guess which one is my sister.)
3. Microsoft FrontRage 2000 [this is not a typo]. Have reinstalled twice and it still crashes every single time I save a fairly basic stylesheet. I don't think XP likes it. (Downloading CoffeeCup stylesheet thingy to see if it's any better: otherwise shall stick to Notepad.)
4. There are, amazingly, still people in the world who don't know that I can't get at my email on the average working day. Luckily this is not an average working day, as I took the afternoon off to write monthly news column. (Yes, of course that's why I'm updating LJ.)
1. Plymouth Social Services (on whom I finally gave up in disgust after 30 minutes on hold) fail to recognise a problem with their crossing out my figures and putting in their own.
"Well, we corrected them."
"If you know the correct values, and I don't, why are you asking me? Can't you just fill in the form on my father's behalf?"
"It's up to you to provide the figures."
"I did. You changed them."
"They were wrong."
2. Text messages sent to four people today. One has left her phone at home: one has forgotten to charge his phone: one has sent a reply that has nothing whatsoever to do with the question: one is AWOL. (For bonus points: guess which one is my sister.)
3. Microsoft FrontRage 2000 [this is not a typo]. Have reinstalled twice and it still crashes every single time I save a fairly basic stylesheet. I don't think XP likes it. (Downloading CoffeeCup stylesheet thingy to see if it's any better: otherwise shall stick to Notepad.)
4. There are, amazingly, still people in the world who don't know that I can't get at my email on the average working day. Luckily this is not an average working day, as I took the afternoon off to write monthly news column. (Yes, of course that's why I'm updating LJ.)
no subject
Date: Thursday, April 1st, 2004 07:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, April 1st, 2004 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, April 1st, 2004 09:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, April 1st, 2004 09:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, April 1st, 2004 10:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, April 1st, 2004 07:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, April 1st, 2004 08:12 am (UTC)No, it's handy for link management etc: I don't do anything especially complex in it, and I edit the HTML rather than relying on FrontPage for anything much. And why do I use it? Because it's the first legitimate website-editing program I've owned, and it's good enough for what I need it for.
Until now ...
Seriously, if you want to recommend me something that is useful in terms of basic layout, provides a text-editing environment that's slightly more site-oriented than Notepad, and doesn't perpetrate horrors on pasted text, then please do!
no subject
Date: Thursday, April 1st, 2004 08:20 am (UTC)I do most humbly apologise for the slur!
I use Dreamweaver, although mostly in code view. But it writes reasonable HTML, the latest version is not at all bad at CSS (although a lot of mine defeats it, because we use CSS rather than tables), and its site management is just as good as FP's was last time I looked at FP. Which is a very long time ago now.
no subject
Date: Thursday, April 1st, 2004 08:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, April 1st, 2004 08:37 am (UTC)Thanks for the recommendation!
Many thanks for rec!
Date: Wednesday, April 7th, 2004 11:05 am (UTC)Now, I need only wait for the day when all browsers are equally CSS-compliant ...
no subject
Date: Thursday, April 1st, 2004 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, April 4th, 2004 11:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, April 5th, 2004 09:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, April 5th, 2004 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, April 6th, 2004 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, April 6th, 2004 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, April 7th, 2004 07:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, April 7th, 2004 10:59 am (UTC)Must say I am very impressed with NoteTab. In fact must say so to Dr P too.
no subject
Date: Thursday, April 8th, 2004 11:14 am (UTC)