Peculiar Pasts

Monday, July 21st, 2003 11:01 am
[personal profile] tamaranth
I've enquired elsewhere about this issue, but the answers are so wildly disparate that I'm beginning to think the question is more complex than it seems!

'Dreamed' and 'dreamt' are both valid past & past participle forms of the verb 'to dream' (according to Fowler and the OED, anyway). The '-t' form, however, seems to be much less widely accepted, and I'm told that it's more or less obsolete in American English.

Also applies to smelled/smelt, burned/burnt, learned/learnt ...

Question: Can anyone explain the difference between the '-ed' and '-t' forms?

Date: Monday, July 21st, 2003 04:19 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] damienw
All I know is that if a verb adds a dental suffix then it's a weak verb, and that at least in OE there are two kinds of weak verb (-ede and -ed/t). So this would seem to be some fossil language. But all of my language books are somewhere else, tho' I would second the suggestion to read Pinker. Hmm. I wonder if anything's lying around here...


July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 234 5
6 7 8 9101112
13 14 15 16 17 1819
20 212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags