on Google Blogsearch
Thursday, September 15th, 2005 06:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
All of this compiled from various panics, Q&A and tech talk elsewhere. I don't like the idea of my content being searchable without my specific say-so, either.
0. Blogsearch is still in beta, does not work as final version will work, and only contains data fromMay-August this year May 2005 onwards.
1. Via a friend with good contacts. "Google knows about the problem with indexing blogs that are marked as "noindex" and they're really sorry. They were leftover from the original test phase and not removed when it went into beta."
2. It's unclear (to me, anyway) whether the blogsearch thing is indexing the actual journal or the 'hypothetical' RSS feed that exists, by default, for every LiveJournal journal or community. (EDIT: Google implies the latter: "The goal of Blog Search is to include every blog that publishes a site feed (either RSS or Atom)." Please note that this does not mean they are lying when they say they don't index LJs with the 'noindex' option ticked. Different source, different destination.)
2a. If the former, they are ignoring the "Block Robots/Spiders from indexing your journal" option on the user info page. (This is what stops your LJ from appearing in standard Google search results, unless of course you don't have it ticked.)
2b. If the latter, you can change your syndication options via the console.
- To set for your own journal, set synlevel level, where level is title | summary | full
- To set for a community, set for communityName synlevel level, where communityName is the name of a community for which you are a maintainer, and level is as above.
gacked from here, where there is a lot of useful info.
3. People are now talking about locked posts being indexed. Haven't seen this and can't replicate. Any examples? Are these posts that have always been locked, or might they have been scraped while unlocked?
0. Blogsearch is still in beta, does not work as final version will work, and only contains data from
1. Via a friend with good contacts. "Google knows about the problem with indexing blogs that are marked as "noindex" and they're really sorry. They were leftover from the original test phase and not removed when it went into beta."
2. It's unclear (to me, anyway) whether the blogsearch thing is indexing the actual journal or the 'hypothetical' RSS feed that exists, by default, for every LiveJournal journal or community. (EDIT: Google implies the latter: "The goal of Blog Search is to include every blog that publishes a site feed (either RSS or Atom)." Please note that this does not mean they are lying when they say they don't index LJs with the 'noindex' option ticked. Different source, different destination.)
2a. If the former, they are ignoring the "Block Robots/Spiders from indexing your journal" option on the user info page. (This is what stops your LJ from appearing in standard Google search results, unless of course you don't have it ticked.)
2b. If the latter, you can change your syndication options via the console.
- To set for your own journal, set synlevel level, where level is title | summary | full
- To set for a community, set for communityName synlevel level, where communityName is the name of a community for which you are a maintainer, and level is as above.
gacked from here, where there is a lot of useful info.
3. People are now talking about locked posts being indexed. Haven't seen this and can't replicate. Any examples? Are these posts that have always been locked, or might they have been scraped while unlocked?
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 05:56 pm (UTC)0. Blogsearch [currently] includes data from 39 minutes ago, but not data from 12 minutes ago.
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 06:19 pm (UTC)the 'hypothetical' RSS feed that exists, by default, for every LiveJournal journal or community.
Huh?
the latter: "The goal of Blog Search is to include every blog that publishes a site feed (either RSS or Atom)."
...
If the latter, you can change your syndication options via the console.
- To set for your own journal, set synlevel level, where level is title | summary | full
So would I be advised to 'set my syndication options' even though I don't (want to) syndicate my journal?
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 06:34 pm (UTC)And now I see Avi's said just the same below ... :)
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 07:02 pm (UTC)I've gone for Title.
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 07:51 pm (UTC)At a guess, the same reason as I only found out about it recently :) it's something that's been introduced since you joined -- e.g. wasn't in the small print then -- and you missed the 'notification' (probably in lj_news or somewhere), or didn't realise its ramifications.
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 10:30 pm (UTC)[Assume I am completely ignorant of RSS stuff, and you won't go far wrong. Splendid in principle, time-consuming and haven't-got-round-to-it in practice!]
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 11:21 pm (UTC)http://ask-leo.com/is_there_a_way_to_track_unique_subscribers_to_my_rss_feed.html
something like http://www.feedburner.com gives you more info. But as LJ doesn't seem to expose the logs we couldn't tell from that. I'm going to ask the blogsearch folks I know if they get those details for LJ the way they do for individual blog sites. how many people read a feed is one of the values they use to see if a blog goes higher in a list of search results.
no subject
Date: Saturday, September 17th, 2005 07:30 pm (UTC)Poke them with sticks!
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 09:35 pm (UTC)It's been in place for a couple of years, but probably wasn't when you signed up.
OTOH, I don't *think* that it is explictly stated when you sign up, now.
There is no way of finding out whether anyone is signed up to it.
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 06:44 pm (UTC)So, if I've got this right, LJ creates a full RSS feed as default, even if that hasn't been actually selected by the user. Right, time to fettle that "synlevel" variable.
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, September 15th, 2005 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, September 19th, 2005 07:19 am (UTC)