Mini-review: Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell
Monday, October 25th, 2004 11:57 amWell, I'm done. Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell is exactly the right length to read on a Plymouth weekend -- train there, train back and sluggish recovery time once home. I did enjoy it very much, and I liked the authorial voice (evident without being intrusive). That said, I felt curiously unsatisfied by the ending; unattached to any of the characters; more intrigued by the hinted backstory than by the plot of the actual novel; and wondering just how much of the hype is simply because it's so very long. (Well, long in comparison to average novel: not that substantial when set next to any one part of the Baroque Cycle. I have just done a word-count on Quicksilver: 396,000 words. Does that make the whole thing the first (?) million-word novel?)
JS&MN kept reminding me of something, and finally I pinned it down: Sylvia Townsend Warner's delightfully urbane Kingdoms of Elfin. Maybe it's just that they're both very grounded in English faery-lore: but it seems more than that, a matter of style as well as content. Also reminded of Patricia McKillip (integration with the land) and some images from Alan Garner, Susan Cooper et al.
And it's beautifully English, right down to that very telling tag of faery lands as being 'on the other side of the rain'. Glorious writing and a great many bits that I'd like to quote -- and will, no doubt, just as soon as I have the thing to hand. But it is rather heavy ...
JS&MN kept reminding me of something, and finally I pinned it down: Sylvia Townsend Warner's delightfully urbane Kingdoms of Elfin. Maybe it's just that they're both very grounded in English faery-lore: but it seems more than that, a matter of style as well as content. Also reminded of Patricia McKillip (integration with the land) and some images from Alan Garner, Susan Cooper et al.
And it's beautifully English, right down to that very telling tag of faery lands as being 'on the other side of the rain'. Glorious writing and a great many bits that I'd like to quote -- and will, no doubt, just as soon as I have the thing to hand. But it is rather heavy ...
no subject
Date: Monday, October 25th, 2004 04:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, October 25th, 2004 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, October 25th, 2004 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, October 25th, 2004 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, October 25th, 2004 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, October 25th, 2004 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, October 25th, 2004 05:06 am (UTC)I really need to write "Longest novels" for Wikipedia. Pointers to good sources welcomed!
Cryptonomicon is a standalone; I suspect calling the whole thing a "novel" is retconning.
no subject
Date: Monday, October 25th, 2004 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, October 25th, 2004 05:44 am (UTC)Wikipedia article on The Lord Of The Rings talks about its status as a single work. It was intended to be a single massive tome, but post-war paper shortages did not allow this.
I have also started List of longest novels at Wikipedia :-D
no subject
Date: Monday, October 25th, 2004 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, October 25th, 2004 05:01 am (UTC)(And re your comment on that earlier post: I think the person who asked her about whether magic only happened in England had a good point. It is very much English magic throughout, performed by English magicians wherever they may be (though is there a mention of a French magician? I can't recall.)
no subject
Date: Tuesday, October 26th, 2004 12:55 pm (UTC)