I can see several problems with this, not least of which is a huge blurring of what is and is not acceptable material. Bearing in mind that a little-appreciated consequence of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 was to raise the cut-off age for child pornography from 16 to 18, could this make any drawing of a teenage girl in a sexy pose potentially suspect? And the less said about furry pix - especially since anthropomorphised animals are often seen as having child-like attributes - the better...
no subject
Date: Wednesday, May 9th, 2007 06:32 pm (UTC)I can see several problems with this, not least of which is a huge blurring of what is and is not acceptable material. Bearing in mind that a little-appreciated consequence of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 was to raise the cut-off age for child pornography from 16 to 18, could this make any drawing of a teenage girl in a sexy pose potentially suspect? And the less said about furry pix - especially since anthropomorphised animals are often seen as having child-like attributes - the better...