Date: Wednesday, May 9th, 2007 12:49 pm (UTC)
That's very odd. I can absolutely understand the difficulty with the exchange of real child pornography. That's wrong, wherever the exchange takes place, because a child would have been harmed in the making of it. For that reason, I can understand why the Second Lifers have to be tracked down and prosecuted.

But virtual child abuse - I'm having trouble getting my head around whether it's harmful of itself, or not. I'm amazed that Germany has an actual sentence for it, though; that seems amazingly progressive. I wonder if it really is a sentence for virtual child abuse, or whether that activity incidentally falls within the sentence for an existing crime.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags