ext_12825 ([identity profile] tamaranth.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] tamaranth 2007-01-04 11:58 am (UTC)

thank you for this -- that Wikipedia page is most useful! (Though surely it won't be thinking about 1700, given that dates start in 1701?) (On the other hand, it might be making false allowances for 2000, not a leap year ...)

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org